1. Chosŏn sidae Kyŏnghak ŭi kwanchŏm kwa yŏnbyŏn -- 2. Han'guk Kyŏnghak yŏn'gu ŭi hoego wa chŏnmang -- 3. Han'guk Kyŏnghak ŭi chŏn'gae wa t'ŭkching -- 4. "Taehak" haesŏk ŭi yŏn'gu hyŏnhwang kwa hyangbang -- 5. Chosŏn sidae "Chungyong" haesŏk ŭi yangsang kwa t'ŭching : Tosŏl ŭl chungsim ŭro -- 6. Chosŏn chŏn'gi kyŏngsŏ haesŏk kwa Yi Hwang, Cho Sik ŭi Kyŏnghak -- 7. Chosŏn hugi Yŏngnam ŭi Kyŏnghak yŏn'gu wa sot'ong ŭi mosaek -- 8. Paekho Yun Hyu ŭi kyŏnghakkwan (...) -- 9. 18-segi ŭi haksul tonghyang kwa Yi Ik ŭi Kyŏnghak -- 10. Sŏngho Yi Ik "Taehak", "Chungyong" haesŏk. (shrink)

1. 21-segi wa t'ongsŏphyŏng injae ŭi p'iryosŏng -- 2. Ch'oe Han-gi, t'ongsŏphyŏng ŭl mal hada -- 3. T'ongsŏphyŏng injae ŭi chagyŏk chokŏn -- 4. T'ongsŏphyŏng injae ŭi lidŏsip -- 5. Naganŭn mal.

Since the middle of the 19th century, East Asia, especially Korea, was oppressed externally by the imperialism of Japan and others while internally long-lasting political convention like in-law government was driving the country into troubles at home and abroad. Witnessing such a situation and building up scholarly capability through reading over nearly all spheres, a Confucian philosopher, Ch’oe Han-gi (崔漢綺, 1803-1877), philosophized about the clue to the solution of such a choking phenomenon. Ch’oe believed that there was movement, ki (matter, (...) material force, energy) of revolving transformation inherent in all things, people, or objects. Grasping even the principle and order of existence inherent in things from the viewpoint of ki, he tried to change the traditional theory on the law of existence of things that there existed an ontological reason lacking in motility, which was more dominant than anything existing in the universe and which ruled over the world. From this, he elucidated that the Way, an identity that rules over all affairs and things, was not simply one but diverse. This means, on one hand, that he tentatively accepted the relativity of things. On the other hand, he also taught us “oneness in all things” in which all including human beings exist in close connection to each other transcending the relativity or “agreement” in which they exist in harmony as one and “unity” in which they are united into one. (shrink)

Ch'aek mŏri e -- 1. Ch'oe Han-gi ŭi sam kwa kŭ ŭi sidae -- 2. Silchŭng kwa siryong ŭi sirhakchŏk hangmun'gwan -- 3. Chujahak pip'an kwa Kihak ŭi hyŏngsŏng -- 4. Sŏyang kwahak kisul ŭi suyong kwa Kihakchŏk pyŏnyong -- 5. Insingnon ŭi chŏnhwan kwa kaekkwan insik ŭi pangbŏmnon -- 6. T'al Chujahakchŏk sayu ŭi chŏn'gae wa segye p'yŏnghwaron -- Kyŏllon : Chosŏn hugi Sirhak kwa Ch'oe Han-gi ŭi ch'ŏrhak.

In this article, it is argued that Ch'oe Han-gi (1803-1877), a Korean Confucian scholar from the late Chosŏn, can be credited with finding the full philosophical significance of the notion of experience (kyŏnghŏm). At the same time, his philosophy of experience can be interpreted adequately in the context of not British empiricist but Confucian philosophical assumptions. There is both continuity and discontinuity in Ch'oe's relation to Confucian tradition. Unlike the Confucian traditionalist, he admitted that inherited knowledge and practice are potentially (...) fallible. Confucian tradition, though still reliable, becomes less important than the process of the world itself, in whose flux all experience must be repeatedly tested. For Ch'oe, humans imbued with configurative energy and with their capability for correlative thinking become skilled in experiencing the world directly without absolute dependence on past Confucian traditions. (shrink)

다문화, 그것은 본질적으로 문화나 문명의 다원성이며 지역적 존재방식과 깊숙하게 연결된다. 이에 인간 존재의 장소에서 다양한 문화의 특수성이 공존한다는 인식은 불가피하다. 사람들의 존재 양태는 그들이 살아가는 공간과 장소에 따라 일정부분 다르다. 그래서 그들은 인종, 민족, 국가 기억 등의 ‘경계’를 이루며 존재한다. 이러는 사이 서로를 배척하거나 상대를 ‘자기 인식체계’ 속에 편입하지 않으려 하기도 한다. 사람들은 역시 자기 동질성을 비본질적이거나 배타적으로 인식한 나머지, ‘나’와 다른 ‘너’의 개별 가치, 존재 방식을 서로 외면한다. 그 결과 서로 간 공생의 기틀을 박탈한다. 한편으로 겉으로는 문화의 다양성을 추구하고 (...) 포용하려는 모습을 띠면서 나와 다른 존재 양태들을 ‘자기 안의 보편성’에 포섭하려 하기도 한다. 여기서 자기와 타자의 가치에 대한 대립적 인식을 극복하고 공존의 기반을 마련하려는 노력이 크게 요구된다. 이 같은 문제의식에서 이 논문은 동아시아 사유, 특히 장자와 최한기의 사유를 통해 다문화적 상대주의의 추구와, 그것을 넘는 존재론적 관계성에 대하여 접근한다. 특히 최한기의 ‘운화기’의 ‘통(通)’, 소통에 주목하여 사물마다의 내재하는 운동성, 변화성, 이동성의 문제를 반추해 봄으로써 사물, 지역 그리고 문명적 가치에 대한 인식의 전환을 모색하고자 한다. (shrink)

I. Singminji sigi p'yŏn -- II. Chŏnhwan'gi ŭi iron oe.